Test your audience first.Ship with evidence.
Synthetic user research, grounded in behavioral science and validated at 86% human accuracy. From weeks to minutes, at a fraction of traditional cost.
Human accuracy — validated
across 46 studies
From questions to
enterprise-grade report
Per study, vs $5,000–$30,000 at a
traditional firm
Trusted By














Traditional user research software and services cost $5,000–$15,000 per study and takes 4–8 weeks to deliver. So teams stretch old data, recycle assumptions, or prompt ChatGPT and call it insight.
Articos exists for every product, UX, messaging, and campaign decision that deserved user research but never got it.
A single user research study from Baymard or NN/g starts at five figures. Most teams can’t afford it for more than a fraction of their decisions.
Recruit, schedule, interview, transcribe, synthesize. By the time findings arrive, the decision already shipped.
You fly blind.Unfunded research turns into gut feeling, Slack debates, and “let’s just ship and see what happens.”
From interview question to structured, actionable UX research report — without recruitment, scheduling, or waiting weeks for traditional user testing.
Set your user research goal
Define what you need to understand, validate, or build strategy around — UX friction, messaging clarity, audience reaction, concept feedback, competitive positioning, or persona development. Setup takes under 3 minutes.
Your audience shows up
Articos generates diverse synthetic personas built on Big Five personality science, cognitive bias mapping, and enforced stance diversity — then interviews them blind to your hypotheses.
This isn’t ChatGPT role-playing a user. It’s structured research methodology.
Get a user research report you can use immediately
Motivations, objections, confusion points, language patterns, and prioritized recommendations — structured into a report you can share with your team, present to clients, or use to make your next call. Exportable. White-label ready.
The firms that define best-in-class user experience research charge $5,000–$30,000 per study and take 4–8 weeks to deliver. We validated Articos UX research reports against their published findings — including Baymard Institute and Nielsen Norman Group. The result: Articos captures 86% of what expert research teams find — in under 30 minutes instead of months.
Articos captures 86% of the themes and findings that expert research teams identify — validated against published research from Baymard Institute and Nielsen Norman Group.
Validated across e-commerce, SaaS, healthcare, fintech, consumer mobile, education, enterprise, cross-cultural, and mixed research domains.
More accurate than prompting the same AI model directly. Same model, different architecture.
Users that disagree by design
30 personality facets, cognitive biases, and enforced stance diversity per persona — so they don't all love your idea. 5 of 12 are calibrated as skeptics and late adopters. If your product, UX, or messaging only works on enthusiasts, you'll know before you ship.
Turn user research into deliverables, not just data
Motivations, objections, clarity issues, prioritized recommendations — structured so your strategist hands it to creative and both teams know what to do next. Export to PDF. White-label ready.
Don't take our word for it.
A language model generates plausible text. A user research platform generates evidence. They look similar from the outside — both produce paragraphs about your users. They’re different categories of work. Articos is what happens when you treat the model as one stage of an online user research pipeline, not the whole answer.
Structured user research with behavioral science grounding
30-facet personas + cognitive biases + enforced diversity
Hypothesis-blind architecture — personas can’t see what you’re hoping to find
Motivations, objections, clarity issues, prioritized recommendations
17 focused themes per study
Projects, studies, team collaboration, white-label export
Upload and get structured audience reactions
Evidence chains, confidence scores, adversarial review
Three teams, three constraints — a launch deadline, a missing budget, a velocity gap. All three need research-quality answers in days, not weeks.
Founders, agencies, consultants, and growth teams — moments when user research replaced assumption.
